An argument against animal testing there should be other means of research

I'm doing a debate on the topic: we should ban animal testing but, while doing some thinking i came across this: we have human trials for new drugs, animals like dogs also use need medicine and obviously this needs to be tested, so eventually it will end up been tests on animals. Horses and other animals such as cows, sheep and pigs are often supplied by dealers and may originate from racing stables or farms for use in animal experiments the rules preventing the use of stray companion animals like dogs and cats vary from country to country. Many medical research institutions make use of non-human animals as test subjects animals may be subject to experimentation or modified into conditions useful for gaining knowledge about human disease or for testing potential human treatments. Fortunately, a wealth of cutting-edge non-animal research methodologies promises a brighter future for both animal and human health the following are common statements supporting animal experimentation followed by the arguments against them.

an argument against animal testing there should be other means of research The support for animal testing is based largely on anecdote and is not backed up, we believe, by the scientific evidence that is out there despite many decades of studying conditions such as cancer, alzheimer's disease, parkinson's disease, diabetes, stroke and aids in animals, we do not yet have reliable and fully effective cures.

The pros and cons of animal research will always be controversial testing animals to see if a product is safe may be better than testing humans first, but that also means the life of an animal is devalued. In general, they feel that animal welfare should be weighed against health benefits, that cosmetic-testing should not be allowed, that there should be supervision to ensure high standards of welfare, that animals should be used only if there is no alternative, and that spot-checks should be carried out. Animal testing - taken here to mean the use of animals in research for the purpose of furthering human concerns such as drug efficacy and the safety of products such as cosmetics - is an endeavor fraught with controversy and difficult ethical arguments.

Opinions about the use of animals for research are complicated and often divided when it comes to different purposes or types of research for instance, a clear majority of people are against the use of animals for testing cosmetics and personal care products. Ultimately, those who are campaigning against cancer should also campaign towards animal testing, as this is how the medicines are tested and proved a source from the science blog of caner research uk states. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the united states for scientific and commercial testing animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses.

We can still maintain that there are other things that count, such as our obligation to treat autonomous agents with dignity, an obligation we don't have to animals perhaps kant's argument against animal cruelty can explain why experiments on the brain damaged are more suspect than experiments on animals. - animal testing animal testing is the running of tests and the research done in a laboratory on animals some of the tests are done to benefit human lives and other tests are done to determine side effects of a certain household or cosmetic products. Aren't there rules, regulations, and laws that govern animal testing no, there aren't there is no experiment under the us animal welfare act that is prohibited, which means that animals can be isolated, starved, electrocuted, poisoned, drugged, and even killed (if it survives this ordeal. The animals act of 1986 ensures that any research using animals must be fully assessed in terms of any harm to the animals this involves detailed examination of the procedures and the number and type of animals used. Background and context animal testing or animal research is the use of non-human animals in scientific experimentation it is estimated that 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals worldwide — from zebrafish to non-human primates — are used annually.

An argument against animal testing there should be other means of research

an argument against animal testing there should be other means of research The support for animal testing is based largely on anecdote and is not backed up, we believe, by the scientific evidence that is out there despite many decades of studying conditions such as cancer, alzheimer's disease, parkinson's disease, diabetes, stroke and aids in animals, we do not yet have reliable and fully effective cures.

The postdoctoral project advances science, adds another argument against the use of animals for biomedical testing, and supports budding scientists committed to new and better research. The biggest issue with animal testing is the fact we are testing on animals while trying to get human results, animals are not human and aren't made up the same way we are there for the drugs with affect us differently. Animal testing is wrong and downright mean innocent animals should not be treated badly and caused pain for the sake of a human's safety many people think animal testing is good while others. Another argument against indirect theories begins with the intuition that there are some things that simply cannot be done to animals for example, i am not permitted to torture my own cat for fun, even if no one else finds out about it.

One of the most common arguments against animal rights is that there are many predators in the wild who hunt and eat meat-based prey why should humans, who are also animals, be exempt animal rights advocates counter that a lion, being a feline, is what is considered an obligate carnivore. Medical advances should be weighed up against the delays and tragedies caused by reliance on animal experiments - the thalidomide disaster whereby tens of thousands of children were born with severe deformities not predicted in animal tests, to name one of the most famous, but there are many others.

We ask two experts for their arguments for and against animal testing for: animals play a small but vital role in research dr bella williams is head of engagement at charity understanding. The 'necessity' of animal research does not mean it isn't necessary to rehearse every possible argument for and against animal research when it comes to animals and ethics, there have. In conclusion, animal testing should be eliminated because it violates animals' rights, it causes pain and suffering to the experimental animals, and other means of testing product toxicity are available. Animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products many of these experiments cause pain to the animals involved or reduce their quality of life in other ways if it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer then experimenting on animals produces serious moral problems.

an argument against animal testing there should be other means of research The support for animal testing is based largely on anecdote and is not backed up, we believe, by the scientific evidence that is out there despite many decades of studying conditions such as cancer, alzheimer's disease, parkinson's disease, diabetes, stroke and aids in animals, we do not yet have reliable and fully effective cures. an argument against animal testing there should be other means of research The support for animal testing is based largely on anecdote and is not backed up, we believe, by the scientific evidence that is out there despite many decades of studying conditions such as cancer, alzheimer's disease, parkinson's disease, diabetes, stroke and aids in animals, we do not yet have reliable and fully effective cures.
An argument against animal testing there should be other means of research
Rated 5/5 based on 27 review